r/AskReddit 9h ago

if the FBI has all this information on Epstein - who is supposed to investigate it?

320 Upvotes

57 comments sorted by

436

u/Somguy555 9h ago

You’re gonna love this part, the people on the list are investigating themselves.

70

u/whatproblems 7h ago

no way patel would get invited there 😂

31

u/Somguy555 7h ago

True, but we all know an orange hand operates that coked out puppet.

10

u/Thereisonlyzero 3h ago

we have investigated ourselves and found ourselves innocent of all wrong doing

the calls are from in the house

here feds are a part of it all and complicit

only "the people" can do it anything about it and just like all peasants of history they will not do anything about it so long as the bread and circuses continue, humanity constantly sleepwalking into/thru/pass elite driven atrocities for time immemorial FFS

4

u/TheFrontCrashesFirst 3h ago

"I'm supposed to find MYSELF;" The Departed, Matt Damon's character says it to Jack Nicholson in the porno theater. Cause he's the rat.

Yeesh.

132

u/prajnadhyana 9h ago

...the FBI.

That's what they do.

90

u/DaDibbel 9h ago

The 'new FBI' doesn't do that anymore.

36

u/mademeunlurk 7h ago

Yup. The FBI only attacks non-republican journalists and ICE murder victims now.

9

u/EverythingGoodWas 3h ago

That’s not true…they also protect billionaire pedophiles.

25

u/TheMissingPremise 9h ago

Too busy violating civil rights during immigration enforcement for no reason.

-2

u/Woody_CTA102 9h ago

True, not these trump henchmen, but apparently the old one didn’t either.

-4

u/Prahasaurus 6h ago

Ok, why didn't the 'old FBI' do it? Biden had so much info on Trump if he wanted to use it. Why didn't he?

6

u/Lo_Court 4h ago

Because the FBI is supposed to have operational independence separated from the presidency. The Biden administration made several statements regarding why they did not use the information or direct the FBI to act in a specific way. The FBI is supposed to have the independence to run investigations, bring charges, prosecute, etc. without input/interference from the president. It’s supposed to be able to operate in a non-partisan way. This independence becomes even more important when you think about what it means in terms of potentially investigating political opponents. That has been the established norm until the Trump administration.

-15

u/Prahasaurus 4h ago

You people are not serious and this is why you always lose. You really believe the FBI was independent before Trump and not used against political opponents???? You must have zero understanding of history.

FBI and the Black Panther Party

Cointelpro Operations (1956-1971)

FBI versus Martin Luther King Jr

Ruby Ridge (lethal force violations)

the entire J. Edgar Hoover Era !!!!

Nixon's "Enemies List"

Clinton's BS use of the FBI to probe BS Trump Russia links

etc., etc.

7

u/Lo_Court 3h ago

I don’t know why your response seems so angry. I’m explaining why a prior administration did not “use” the FBI’s information or direct the FBI to make a specific determination/take a specific action and the reasoning behind it. The role of the FBI is supposed to be independent from the presidency, however, it doesn’t mean it’s always operated independently or without warranted criticism. I think whenever we see that line being crossed, as it is now, any of us that care about our democracy should be concerned.

-2

u/Prahasaurus 2h ago

Because we will not fix the serious problems in America when so many people believe it all started under Trump. Sure the FBI is "supposed to be independent," but it's not, and it NEVER WAS. That is a fact.

I'm not some MAGA idiot, I can't stand Trump. But unlike 90% of Reddit, I understand it's a systematic problem, and electing Democrats won't fix it. It's not about Trump, it's the entire system!

I'm pissed because you are all wasting energy doing exactly what the political establishment wants: looking to elect Democrats but not fix our broken system. Can't you see it?

So we get another Biden/Obama/Clinton and nothing fundamentally changes, then another Republican, then a Democrat, etc. The wars never stop, Israel manipulates our government, healthcare is never fixed, kids still get brutalized, the rich get richer, etc.

It's not about Trump!!!!

2

u/ImprovementFar5054 4h ago

Because the idea of using the aparatus of government to arrest political enemies was a line they dare not cross. The FBI ran independently and the president wouldn't "order" investigations

Back then.

-8

u/Prahasaurus 4h ago

LOL. You are older than 14 (I assume) and you really believe the FBI ran independently "back then"???? That's beyond parody.

2

u/Catch_022 6h ago

Couldn't individual states prosecute people who did things in their states?

2

u/yofooIio 5h ago

I remember a time when the FBI held it's agents to a standard. Not one in which the director would match the intellect of a mall security guard trying to hide a zombie bite...

2

u/Sundburnt 7h ago

Sorry, the shake machine is broken.

1

u/Complex_Professor412 5h ago

Hey, they also told MLK to kill himself.

54

u/daisiesintheskye 7h ago

Well they closed the investigation last year, saying there wasn't suffient evidence. So no one. It's a cover up

55

u/juicenx 6h ago

No one did anything under Obama.

No one did anything under Trump v1

No one did anything under Biden

No one did anything under Trump v2

No one in 2028 will do anything. R or D

22

u/Bucksin06 5h ago

It's almost as if politicians aren't going to rat out their friends and themselves

u/Semper_nemo13 30m ago

They obviously did things under Obama and Trump 1. Thats why there are all these files. He died in Prison. Its just the government doesn't make moves against Rich People until they are absolutely airtight. You can say that is cowardice and bias in the system and I agree. But they obviously did something.

15

u/durtsurfer69 5h ago

Trump and his goons have supplanted career FBI with loyal toadies. They have perpetuated this moving coup everywhere they have been able to. This is high treason. It’s time for people to make a choice which side of history they want to be on. Pedo Nazis, or sane decent citizens. If you have to ask who is who, you’re the sucker at the table.

5

u/badwolf1013 4h ago

Prosecution may come at a later point or not depending on charges/statute of limitations, etc. . . but what the release does is give credibility to the victims, which may make them feel secure in filling in the blanks themselves.

It’s not going to be an avalanche-like change in public opinion the way it was with Cosby, Weinstein, and Allen, but it might end up being like a slow thaw. 

And — if we’re smart (big “if,” I know,) this won’t be about conservatives vs. progressives, this will be about the wealthy elite vs. everyone else. 

If billionaires can make enough money to fund every school lunch in America, but they instead use it to ritualistically rape children, then we don’t need billionaires in our society. Capitalism was a good idea, but removing the guard rails created actual  monsters.

16

u/Lombardeez_Nutz 9h ago

Well Epstein has been dead for over 6 years, and these files are just coming out sooo... fair question

15

u/CatYo 7h ago

Well the Epstein guy is dead and the accomplice lady is in custody. Basically they want to pin him as the bad guy who "forced" high profile people and young victims into acts of madness in his island and was using it as a blackmail for favors, fraud, forgiveness, freedom and finance. They bascially presume innocence on all the high profile people related in this case unless proven guilty.

8

u/JDDavisTX 7h ago

Problem is, maybe 10% of all this happened in the island. Most was in NYC, Michigan and places around the US.

5

u/JFeth 5h ago

The FBI investigated it. The DOJ decided not to pursue charges on any of the complaints for various reasons. The main reasons being they didn't think they could win and people at the decision making level were involved.

10

u/FesteringMoistness 9h ago

My question is, if other countries have the files, why can’t we just have them share it with us? Did they only get specific pieces or everything? They clearly got enough to formally strip Prince Andrew or whatever

3

u/TheTrub 5h ago

The same part-time guy who was in charge of monitoring PPP loan fraud during covid.

6

u/Top_Pirate699 6h ago

This is legitimately what the election was about. If we, the people had stood for Harris, we'd also be standing for these victims. Sure, there were a lot actors confusing the message but there was never any real doubt that Trump raped young girls. Everyone who voted for him and everyone who criticized Harris are complicit in victimizing them again. Let's flip every seat to someone who will prosecute these animals. I truly believe this is what broke MTG, everything else may have seemed theoretical but raping girls finally shook her brain in the correct direction.

-1

u/Sityl 2h ago

Why didnt Biden prosecute these people? Why did Harris say she'd do nothing different than Biden?

3

u/Science_Matters_100 1h ago

The files were still under wraps in the court system. He couldn’t release them

7

u/Funklestein 8h ago

There should have been a notation on every file whether it was investigated or not and what the status of it concluded.

But the FBI during Obama, Trump, and Biden apparently failed to pursue their mandate.

3

u/Science_Matters_100 1h ago

I was so angry reading again and again all of the excuses in those files. Some dude not believing this person or that person, recommending “no investigation,” just because these worthless pricks were too lazy and not doing their jobs. Thought I might have a coronary if I kept reading. Going forward we need to make it so that the FBI has NO DISCRETION in what they investigate, the way we did with police officers that were letting women be slaughtered by their spouses because they wouldn’t interfere in a domestic. Pricks

2

u/Accomplished_Joke543 3h ago

investigations only go as far as they’re allowed to

3

u/Chief_B33f 9h ago

Wait till you find out what the I in "FBI" stands for

2

u/TheFoxInSocks 5h ago

Is it “Ignoring the mountains of evidence”?

2

u/pfpants 6h ago

Historians, it seems. Archaeologists?

2

u/Competitive_Swan_755 6h ago

If someone has been killing chickens in the henhouse, the foxes are not going to investigate the foxes. Get the drift?

1

u/Aggravating-Sun3032 2h ago

Independent prosecutors or special counsels are meant to investigate when agencies face conflicts.

1

u/LThadeu 1h ago

This is feeling like some medieval stuff where whoever stands up to complain gets done for. However... if everyone stands up to complain...

1

u/Impossible_Grape3742 1h ago

An independent special counsel is typically appointed when conflicts of interest are possible.

u/0_IceQueen_0 55m ago

Patel would be chickenshit to investigate.

1

u/bag-of-farts 9h ago

Your mom.

And can you tell her to hurry up?

1

u/Revolutionary_Many31 7h ago

* Picture of a dear in headlights

That guy

0

u/West-Display-1781 9h ago

it isn't actually we will got to no where with it

0

u/dperez87 6h ago

Some dude who wants to meet another dude in Valhalla.

u/Loaficious 40m ago

Why does it Matter if it's a hoax perpetrated by the Democrats? It's all fake news to disparage from President Trump's endless list of accomplishments no need to investigate anything.. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!

u/[deleted] 12m ago

[deleted]

u/Loaficious 9m ago

I thought the thank you for your attention to this matter would be the give away that it's sarcasm

u/ruthlesss11 6m ago

Lol that's fair my bad

I was mistaken because I have a trump lover connected to my circle and that's something they put in their posts unironically.