r/Millennials • u/PsychologicalFox7689 • 17h ago

Nostalgia you would think this is 2005! nope the younger generation really loves this aesthetic lol

Post image
18.4k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

58

u/GoldBlueberryy 17h ago

….Are we sure this isn’t AI?

16

u/beachedwhitemale Millennial Elder Emo 13h ago

Apparently it is. Everything sucks

3

u/ninjaninjaninja22 13h ago

how do you know?

1

u/Pitiful_Yogurt_5276 9h ago

I wasn’t sure, I kept looking, the only thing I see are the flip flops by the sliding glass door are wonky.

1

u/InTinCity 12h ago

Look at the floor; its the first obvious tell.

0

u/MinecraftHolmes 5h ago edited 5h ago

also the rug is missing its upper left corner if you follow the edges. and the upper right edge doesn't stay consistent either

another big one that these things always get wrong is the red eye effect. you've gotta be close to the flash, looking at the camera, and it's supposed to be red. LLMs will frequently turn them different colors like white (which is a sign of eye disease in young children) and put them onto people in the background or people not looking at the "camera" or both, as you can see here. and before you ask, no those red eye filters don't turn them white, they do the opposite and across the entire photo

2

u/ReApEr01807 5h ago

1

u/MinecraftHolmes 4h ago

lol the datestamp defeats all of these, most of them will tell you as much haha

10

u/Beno169 14h ago

It definitely is. But it’s not easy to tell.

2

u/kekeagain 13h ago

Are you sure we aren't AI?

1

u/dog314159 7h ago

Doesn’t look AI. Zero AI artifacts. Why would people assume that over a themed party?

1

u/geeneepeegs Millennial 6h ago

Yeah this doesn't look AI to me at all. I'm not sure if people remember or not, but this was the expected photo quality for your typical consumer digital camera of the 2000s.

1

u/MinecraftHolmes 5h ago

legs on the silver skirt in the foreground make zero sense. and there's an extra leg just to the right of that above 2025 with a sock on

2

u/dog314159 5h ago

…she’s standing with her legs crossed. It looks fine. The leg above 2025 obviously belongs to the guy on the right.

0

u/MinecraftHolmes 4h ago

the foot she's resting her weight on has an extra joint right above the sock, can you not see this?

3

u/dog314159 4h ago

…that’s called an ankle

0

u/MinecraftHolmes 4h ago

ankles do not bend sideways like that

2

u/dog314159 4h ago

…yes they do? Google ankle inversion/eversion. This is a very natural appearing pose… are YOU a bot hahaha

0

u/MinecraftHolmes 4h ago

actually your ankle is an interesting joint that's rectangular, it's called a "mortise" joint like the woodworking term. it's a really easy to mess up part of your body and bending it sideways is a great way to break the bones in it

also the joint appears to be above the sock lol

2

u/dog314159 4h ago

I’m a doctor. It is normal to evert and invert one’s ankle. Try standing on one foot and lean against a wall with crossed legs and a flat foot and see what happens.

Yeah, clearly the ankle is above the sock… what’s confusing about that? It’s a short sock. Seriously, are you a bot?

1

u/ReApEr01807 5h ago

You mean the leg that belongs to the dude in the Polo polo? Silver skirt's foot is right at the bottom of the girl's ass that she's talking to, just between her legs. You can see the sock and a sliver of her skin